Outline for Reflective Essay (part a) and Outline for Final Essay (part b) Part

Outline for Reflective Essay (part a) and Outline for Final Essay (part b)
Part 1a: Define
Define the big idea, key concept, or terminology. Include important examples and counterexamples used by our authors. ONLY use references from our course materials. Parenthetical references are fine; no bib needed.
Part 1b:
Refine with textual evidence
You will need to locate 3-4 quotes from our readings refining the definition of the big idea, and explain the idea in greater detail across 3-4 paragraphs. This is your chance to revise any misunderstanding from your reflection presentation, but also to specify more closely how the philosopher’s specific big idea is different from the common sense definition of the concept chosen (ex. Aristotle on friendship vs general usage of friendship.) For the final paper, you will be graded for accuracy in your definition and the quality of your textual support
.
Part 2a: Reflect on place in class
Discuss why you think this idea was assigned in any Ethics class and this class in particular.
Part 2b: Put into dialogue with another philosopher, author, or film To demonstrate an analytic (not reflective or speculative) understanding of our materials, you will need to integrate the work of another text/film from the class. There are several options for developing your analytical
writing: 1) show how another text extends or expands the idea you chose, 2) show how another text points to an oversight (missing) point that should be added to the big idea, OR 3) show how another text helps us in understanding an important ethical problem or question raised by the big idea. You will need to use at least 3-4 quotes or scenes from the other author/film as textual evidence to support your analysis. Again, you will be assessed according to the quality and accuracy of the connections you draw. It helps to almost role play a dialogue between the author of the big idea and another author from the class.
What would they say to one another if they met in real life and had a conversation about the big idea?
Part 3a: Impact
Explain why you chose to focus on this idea and what is important about it to you. Write in the first person and as if you are trying to explain the impact of this idea. You may want to also raise questions or describe possibilities for applying this idea.
Part 3b: Impact as the class concludes.
This section should be written in the first-person and should discuss what the idea means to you now that we have finished the class. How will it stay with you after the end of the semester? This section is still reflective,
but it is a summary reflection that draws together your understanding of the entire semester. This section should comprise no more than 250-500 words of your paper.
Guidelines
Hello there, thank you for helping me. For the Final paper is really meant to be a revision and analytic extension of reflective paper. You have to expand the reflective paper that I attached. Also Please provide example and counter example and make sure to use only from the resources that I provided. Most importantly add another philosopher to support the paper and please quote text evidence to support the claim. Also please follow the paper guide line that I posted.
I already wrote the reflective paper which is part A of the guide lines. You should focus on Part B. I’m attaching my reflective paper and all the necessary resources. Please don’t use outside resources. And also please sure to sync with my reflective paper. Essentially, you need to follow the directions above and turn in polished college-level writing
Resources:
Utilitarianism: Crash Course Philosophy #36
https://www.utilitarianism.com/mill1.htm
https://www.utilitarianism.com/mill2.htmExposing the \”Thread-Bare Lie\”: How Ida B. Wells Used Investigative Journalism to Uncover the Truth About Lynching | Ida B. Wells | Chicago Stories | WTTW Chicago. This includes primary materials of images and writing from Wells. Some of the images are graphic, but you have to click-through to view them.
Also I’ll attach a copy of the reading notes and my REFLECTIVE PAPER.
Please make sure to watch the film and go over the readings prior to starting and follow the prompt to answer the question. Please make sure to quote from the readings to support the paper. And also please don’t forget about citations. Min 2000 words.
No plagiarism should be found. Let me know if you can access all the links.
Thank you!