I have chosen this article to do my assignment on Biden Administration Expands

I have chosen this article to do my assignment on
Biden Administration Expands Protections for Haitian Migrants link is below
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/us/politics/hai… PowerPoint that you will use to supplement your presentation. Clips and articles can be embedded in a PowerPoint.
Clearly identify the argument. Present the premises and conclusion in your chosen article or video clip and explain their importance. Did the speakers/writers use deductive or inductive reasoning?
In your article or video clip, identify three of the following: vague/ambiguous language; credibility; cognitive bias; rhetoric; logical fallacies; generalizations; arguments from analogy; cause and effect reasoning; and value judgments about morality, law, or aesthetics.
Explain why you think the argument fits this concept. Also, identify if this was purposeful and why, and how this affects the strength of the argument.
Provide a conclusion to your video. Was the argument convincing? What is your position?Current Affairs Video PresentationCurrent Affairs Video PresentationCriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent75 to >66.75 ptsExceeds ExpectationsClearly demonstrates the formation of an argument based on the objectives of the assignment. The topic is covered thoroughly and expertly, and all questions are answered. Sophisticated discussion centers around critical thinking concepts and terminology. Sources are referenced.66.75 to >59.25 ptsMeets ExpectationsDemonstrates the formation of an argument based on the objectives of the assignment. The topic is mostly explained and not all questions may be answered. Discussion centers around critical thinking concepts and terminology. Sources are referenced but may be slightly erroneous.59.25 to >54.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationsLacks clarity in the formation of an argument based on the objectives of the assignment. The topic is not thoroughly covered, which makes the meaning of the assignment unclear. Discussion related to critical thinking concepts and terminology is limited. Sources are not always referenced.54 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsLacks clarity, argumentative structure, AND is not connected to the objectives of the assignment. The topic is poorly explained with gaps in knowledge. Not all questions may be answered. Sources are not referenced.
75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization30 to >26.7 ptsExceeds ExpectationsMain points are clear and supported. Transitions are clear and logical, the organization is well planned, and the language used is appropriate and skillfully presented. Organization shows the speaker’s perceptive ability to connect concepts together as a critical thinker.26.7 to >23.7 ptsMeets ExpectationsInformation is generally presented in a clear and logical order. The speaker presents the content in a somewhat organized manner but may lack confidence in the presentation. Organization shows the speaker’s ability to connect concepts together as a critical thinker.23.7 to >21.6 ptsApproaches ExpectationsInformation is presented in a way that shows little organization or order. The speaker fails to present the topic in a logical manner or does so in a way that is confusing. Organization of the presentation sometimes connects ideas together, but this is done in a less than effective manner.21.6 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsInformation is not presented in a clear, logical, or cohesive order. The topic is unclear, and the presentation is marred with erroneous or inconsistent information. Organization does not show a connection between concepts to highlight critical thinking skills.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality15 to >13.35 ptsExceeds ExpectationsExpertly incorporates multimedia with presentation content and contains no misspellings, grammatical errors, or flaws; slides and media are purposeful, clear, and engaging.13.35 to >11.85 ptsMeets ExpectationsIncorporates multimedia with presentation content seamlessly with 1 to 3 misspellings, grammatical errors, or flaws; slides and media are purposeful and clear, but may need to be more visually interesting.11.85 to >10.8 ptsApproaches ExpectationsSome incorporation of multimedia with presentation content and contains 3 or more misspellings, grammatical errors, or flaws; slides are not always purposeful nor clear and need to be more visually interesting.10.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsLittle to no attempt at incorporating multimedia within presentation and contains several misspellings, grammatical errors or flaws that hinder understanding’ slides are not thoughtful nor visually interesting.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDelivery30 to >26.7 ptsExceeds ExpectationsSpeaker maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around). Speaker does not rely on notes nor slides Uses academic tone and language.26.7 to >23.7 ptsMeets ExpectationsSpeaker generally maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around) with only a few lapses. Speaker sometimes relies on reading notes and/or slides. Mostly uses academic tone and language.23.7 to >21.6 ptsApproaches ExpectationsSpeaker indicates little preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. Speaker reads mostly from notes and/or is not prepared. Some attempt at using academic tone and language.21.6 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsSpeaker indicates no preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. Speaker reads exclusively from notes and/or slides and is not prepared; delivery is distracting and takes away from the content. Little to no attempt at using academic tone and language.
30 pts