For this assignment, choose a dyad you are a part of in your family (e.g., you a

For this assignment, choose a dyad you are a part of in your family (e.g., you and your mom, you and your sibling, you and your cousin, etc.).
Complete the Personal Listening Style Profile (Links to an external site.) for yourself. If you’d like to do so, you may have the other person complete it is as well but this is NOT required. NOTE: You do NOT need to complete page 4 of the Personal Listening Style Profile and you do NOT need to turn in the completed profile.
With the relationship you selected in mind, write an analysis in paragraph format (an effective analysis is typically 2 pages in length) addressing these areas:
– According to the results of your Personal Listening Style Profile (Links to an external site.), what type of listener are you? Explain why you believe this is or is not accurate using specific examples from your own life. Note: You do NOT need to complete page 4 of the Personal Listening Style Profile or turn in the completed profile.
– What type of listener do you believe your family member is? Note: the other person doesn’t need to take the Personal Listening Style Profile. You can make a choice and explain why you picked it.
– As described in the video lecture and in your textbook, apply all of the components of listening to a recent conversation you’ve had with your family member whose listening style you identified. Please explain the component and provide a specific example for each of them from the same conversation. Note: Please refer to the section in the textbook entitled “Components of Listening” for this question. You must apply each of the components to the same conversation with your family member.
– Using the information from the textbook and the supplemental resources for this week, what listening barrier(s) were evident in the conversation you applied the listening components to with your family member? You must identify the barriers for the same conversation that you applied the listening components to.
– Using the information from the textbook, identify the type(s) of listening response you used and/or your family member used during the same conversation that you applied the listening components to.
Submit your answer by uploading a file using the appropriate link in this week’s module. Please use either Word (.docx or .doc) or Rich Text File format for uploading your file. Name the file using your last name followed by your first name followed by the name of the assignment (e.g., Ward Susan Effective Listening).
Please use Edited Standard Written English including checking your spelling and grammar (see the syllabus for more information). Also, please use MLA format as necessary for source citations.
This task counts toward your homework grade for the course and will be graded using the homework grading rubric located in the syllabus.
Rubric
Listening Analysis
Listening Analysis
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal Listening Profile of Self
9 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
Clearly identifies listening style; Clearly explains whether or not style is accurate by using relevant and compelling examples to illustrate the style. Provides specific and well developed details clearly explaining how examples link to the style.
7 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Listening style is identified; Accuracy of listening style is not stated clearly and/or specific relevant and compelling examples are not used to illustrate the style. Does not provide specific and well developed details clearly explaining how examples link to the style.
6 to >1.0 pts
Developing
Listening style is not clearly identified and/or accuracy of style is addressed more implicitly than explicitly with or without personal examples. All relevant information for understanding is not presented.
1 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Listening style is not addressed.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal Listening Profile of Family Member
9 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
Clearly identifies listening style; Clearly explains whether or not style is accurate by using relevant and compelling examples to illustrate the style. Provides specific and well developed details clearly explaining how examples link to the style.
7 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Listening style is identified; Accuracy of listening style is not stated clearly and/or specific relevant and compelling examples are not used to illustrate the style. Does not provide specific and well developed details clearly explaining how examples link to the style.
6 to >1.0 pts
Developing
Listening style is not clearly identified and/or accuracy of style is addressed more implicitly than explicitly with or without personal examples. All relevant information for understanding is not presented.
1 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Listening style is not addressed.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComponents of Listening
9 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
Clearly and accurately identifies, describes, and applies each of the components to the specific exchange with the identified family member by using relevant and compelling examples to illustrate mastery of the components. Provides well developed details clearly explaining how examples link to concepts.
7 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Components are identified; General descriiption is given accurately and/or general application of the component is present using specific examples. Some relevant information for understanding presented.
6 to >1.0 pts
Developing
Not all components are identified. Descriiption given is not accurate or is missing and/or application of component is not accurate or is missing. All relevant information for understanding is not presented.
1 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Components not addressed.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeListening Barriers
9 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
Clearly and accurately identifies, describes, and applies the relevant listening barriers from the exchange by using relevant and compelling examples to illustrate mastery of the barriers. Provides specific and well developed details clearly explaining how examples link to concepts.
7 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Listening barriers are identified; General descriiption is given accurately and/or general application of the barrier is present using specific examples. Some relevant information for understanding presented.
6 to >1.0 pts
Developing
Not all listening barriers are identified and/or descriiption given is not accurate or is missing and/or application of barrier is not accurate or is missing. All relevant information for understanding is not presented.
1 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Barriers not addressed.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeListening Responses
9 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
Clearly and accurately identifies, describes, and applies the relevant listening responses from the exchange by using relevant and compelling examples to illustrate mastery of the response(s) by providing specific and well developed details clearly explaining how examples link to concepts.
7 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Listening responses are identified; General descriiption is given accurately and/or general application of the response(s) is present using specific examples. Some relevant information for understanding presented.
6 to >1.0 pts
Developing
Not all response(s) are identified and/or descriiption given is not accurate or is missing and/or application of response(s) is not accurate or is missing. All relevant information for understanding is not presented.
1 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Responses not addressed.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics
5 pts
Excellent
Ideas are presented in a clear, organized fashion using clear and grammatically correct prose. MLA style used as needed. No major grammatical /spelling errors.
3.5 pts
Proficient
Organization is competent and ideas are generally well presented in clear and grammatically correct prose. Minor grammatical /spelling errors. MLA style used with a few errors.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Ideas are presented in a disorganized way and/or with lapses in clarity and grammatical correctness. Several grammatical / spelling errors. MLA style is not used appropriately.
5 pts
Total Points: 50