Develop a presentation video that covers all major areas of your project. For th

Develop a presentation video that covers all major areas of your project. For the presentation of your PowerPoint, use Loom to create a 10-12 minute voice-over or a video. Please add speaking notes at the bottom of each slide for 10-12 minute voice over.
Be sure to address the following:
Site/organization
Needs assessment results
Project topic
Project goals
Project outcome (or anticipated outcome if not implemented)
How was your project received by stakeholders?
If you implemented your project, how will it be sustained? If it is not sustainable, how will the one-time implementation make a difference?
If you did not implement your project, how did you perform a hand-off for the next steps?
Ultimately, what did you learn from this project?
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric Criteria
Collapse All Rubric Criteria
Collapse All
Organization and Results of the Needs Assessment
5 points
Criteria Description
A description of the organization and results of the needs assessment
5. Target
5 points
The description of the organization and results of the needs assessment is thorough.
4. Acceptable
4.35 points
The description of the organization and results of the needs assessment is detailed.
3. Approaching
3.95 points
The description of the organization and results of the needs assessment is present.
2. Insufficient
3.7 points
The description of the organization and results of the needs assessment is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The description of the organization and results of the needs assessment is not present.
Topic, Goals, and Outcome of the Project
5 points
Criteria Description
A description of the topic, goals, and outcome of the project
5. Target
5 points
The description of the topic, goals, and outcome of the project is thorough.
4. Acceptable
4.35 points
The description of the topic, goals, and outcome of the project is detailed.
3. Approaching
3.95 points
The description of the topic, goals, and outcome of the project is present.
2. Insufficient
3.7 points
The description of the topic, goals, and outcome of the project is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The description of the topic, goals, and outcome of the project is not present.
Reception of the Project by Stakeholders
5 points
Criteria Description
A summary of how the stakeholders received the project
5. Target
5 points
The summary of how the stakeholders received the project is thorough.
4. Acceptable
4.35 points
The summary of how the stakeholders received the project is detailed.
3. Approaching
3.95 points
The summary of how the stakeholders received the project is present.
2. Insufficient
3.7 points
The summary of how the stakeholders received the project is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The summary of how the stakeholders received the project is not present.
Sustainability and Next Steps
5 points
Criteria Description
A description of the sustainability and next steps of the project
5. Target
5 points
The description of the sustainability and next steps of the project is thorough.
4. Acceptable
4.35 points
The description of the sustainability and next steps of the project is detailed.
3. Approaching
3.95 points
The description of the sustainability and next steps of the project is present.
2. Insufficient
3.7 points
The description of the sustainability and next steps of the project is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The description of the sustainability and next steps of the project is not present.
What the Student Learned
5 points
Criteria Description
A summary of what the student learned from the project
5. Target
5 points
The summary of what the student learned from the project is thorough.
4. Acceptable
4.35 points
The summary of what the student learned from the project is detailed.
3. Approaching
3.95 points
The summary of what the student learned from the project is present.
2. Insufficient
3.7 points
The summary of what the student learned from the project is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The summary of what the student learned from the project is not present.
Presentation of Content
10 points
Criteria Description
Presentation of Content
5. Target
10 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable
8.7 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
3. Approaching
7.9 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
2. Insufficient
7.4 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
Layout
5 points
Criteria Description
Layout
5. Target
5 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
4. Acceptable
4.35 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
3. Approaching
3.95 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
2. Insufficient
3.7 points
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
Language Use and Audience Awareness
5 points
Criteria Description
Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.
5. Target
5 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
4. Acceptable
4.35 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
3. Approaching
3.95 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
2. Insufficient
3.7 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Mechanics of Writing
2.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target
2.5 points
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
4. Acceptable
2.18 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
1.98 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
1.85 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation
2.5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.)
5. Target
2.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable
2.18 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
1.98 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient
1.85 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total
50 points