Philosophy

what are some of the basic tenets, pros and cons, of each of the following: 1) Virtue Ethics 2) Deontology 3) Utilitarianism Remember, this post should read like an essay. What is your take on each of these? Which one most closely resembles your own decision making process? Which do you recommend to others moving […]

1. Using the assigned readings, explain deep ecology. Be sure to include how it differs from shallow ecology and what it values. 2. Explain Guha’s criticism of deep ecology. 3. Do you agree with Guha’s criticism?luv Why or why not? Justify your answer.

Informative Essay on \”Foundation of Army Leadership\” -Introduction -Topic 1: \”Foundation of Army Leadership\” https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/nco-journal/images/2021/January/Respect/Leadership-Respect.pdf -Topic 2: \”Principles of Modern\” Leadershiphttps://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/NCO-Journal/Archives/2018/May/12-Principles-Part1/ -Topluvic 3: \”Reflection on Military\” https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/nco-journal/images/2021/March/Reflection/Reflections.pdf -Conclusion

Prompt: Chapter 1 Essay Week is about the purpose of philosophy: 1.) Share some examples of how philosophy is connected to the sciences. 2.) What is the aim of philosophy according to Russell? Your essay should: Answer the essay questions thoroughly in no fewer than 400 words. Be written in standard essay format: Introduction; includes

This is an initial Discussion post 1.) Define and describe dialectic. Share specific examples of how you can use this method in your personal and professional life. 2.) What is truth? 3.) What is a fallacy, and how can you avoid it? Be sure to respond to your peers’ answers with engaged intereluvst to expand

Please make use of the sources listed in the other doc “Link sources” to help write the title and reference. May use other sources as well. Paper must only include introduction and body paragraphs: Introduction: establishing some clarity about the key terms and concepts used in the title. stating a position, that is, agree, disagree,

St. Anselm states that if we deny God\’s existence we have a contradiction. Explain how this argument works and why it is convincing. Gaunilo didn\’t think the argument worked at all. Explain Gaunilo\’s criticism of Anselm\’s argument and why his criticism is convincing. Explain Anselm\’s response to Gaunilo. Why does the argument work for God

4 thoughtful comments required for full credit Suggestions about what to write Below are some helpful suggestions about how to annotate readings from Danny Weltman, a philosophy professor at Ashoka University: \”Hopefully you will not have trouble thinking up things to write in Perusall. If you are reading closely and thinking carefully about the texts,

Essay\’s topic: Compare/contrast Hobbes and Locke\’s views on the social contract. Next step: Figure out what to argue about who has the better understanding of the social contract, who is correct, Locke or Hobbes. And create an argument about why it\’s important to understand both perspectives to fully understand what \’social contracts\’ are. Explain each

Analyze the major points of George Washington’s “Farewell Address” and consider the contemporary government along with the following questions: Were the warnings and exhortations followed in the days since Washington’s presidency? What items did Washington feel of utmost importance as he left office? Including differing poinluvts of view is preferred and encouraged.