Learning Goal: I\’m working on a nutrition question and need a sample publish to he

Learning Goal: I\’m working on a nutrition question and need a sample publish to help me learn.There is considerable controversy over the use of GMOs (genetically-modified organisms) in our food supply today. The majority of some crops in the U.S., such as corn and soy, are produced through GMO technology. And without labeling laws, consumers have a hard time knowing if what they are eating is GMO-produced.There are pros and cons to using GMOs in agriculture. Inform yourself of both sides of the issue by reading this New York Times article using this link (Links to an external site.) or viewing the PDF: ProQuestDocuments-2021-12-11.pdfand watching this video (11 minutes). (Note: for the NYT article you will need to subscribe but it only takes a second and is FREE).Why are GMOs Bad? (Links to an external site.)Then, answer the following questions. Be sure to substantiate your opinion with research if it is not in the above sources. After reading the article and watching the video, do you still have concerns over GMOs? Why or why not?
What do you think is the biggest advantage of using GMOs in food production? Use a reference from one of the resources to substantiate your position.
Do you think labeling of GMO-produced foods is important? Why or why not?
Based on what you have learned, have you changed your mind about the safety of GMOs? Would you be more likely to buy them for you and your family?
and then I will provid two replies from students and I will need replies for them pleaseDiscussion Board Rubric_10ptsDiscussion Board Rubric_10ptsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness and Frequency of Posts2 ptsExcellentStudent completes all post requirements and replies to two or more peers. Discussion board is visited more than once and posts are distributed throughout the week. Both the Wednesday and Sunday deadline is met.1.5 ptsGoodWednesday or Sunday deadline was missed, or all discussion board threads were posted on the same day and not distributed throughout the week.0.5 ptsBelow StandardStudent posts less than three times before the deadline.0 ptsUnacceptableNo posts on the discussion board.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post2 ptsExcellentPost is well developed that fully addresses and develops all questions in the prompt. Student’s post supports the creation of knowledge by going beyond what is asked. This may be done through reference to personal experience,other class information, and outside research.1.5 ptsGoodStudent post asks and answers insightful questions and adds to the course knowledge through information taken from personal experience and understanding of the readings.0.5 ptsBelow StandardStudent post answers questions without elaboration. Not all questions in the prompt are answered.0 ptsUnacceptableNo initial post on the discussion board.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-up Posts2 ptsExcellentDemonstrates analysis of others’ posts: extends meaningful discussion by building on previous posts1.5 ptsGoodElaborates on an existing posting with further comments or observation.0.5 ptsBelow StandardLimited contribution to the discussion (simple agreement or disagreement without elaboration)0 ptsUnacceptableNo follow-up posts on the discussion board.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContributions to Learning Community2 ptsExcellentStudent postings show thorough knowledge of assigned reading through thoughtful and insightful comments related to assigned content.1.5 ptsGoodStudent postings show general knowledge of assigned content. (Cursory comments)1 ptsBelow StandardStudent postings show vague or limited reference to assigned readings and videos.0 ptsUnacceptableNo posts on the discussion board.2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, Professionalism and Overall Quality2 ptsExcellentNo errors in grammar or mechanics. Posts are clear and well organized. Student responses to peers are polite. Posts are some of the best on the DB for that week.1 ptsGoodSeveral errors in grammar or mechanics. Posts are not well organized. Student responses to peers are polite. Post are good but not identified as some of the best that week.0 ptsUnacceptableNumerous errors in grammar or mechanics. Student responses to peers are impolite or no posts on the discussion board.2 ptsTotal Points: 10