For this video, choose one item that addresses a current issue and makes connect

For this video, choose one item that addresses a current issue and makes connections to class concepts. The item may be print or video—for example, an article from the current edition of a newspaper or magazine, a segment from a news or talk show, a YouTube video, vlog, or any program that features current affairs.
Your item (up to 2 minutes) will be embedded in a PowerPoint that you will use to supplement your presentation.
You may use clips of a video, pause a video as necessary to identify concepts, or use a clip for a full 2 minutes. However, you cannot use over two minutes of video in your own presentation.
Items cannot be more than 90 days old.
Clips and articles can be embedded in a PowerPoint that you will use to supplement your presentation or you can share your screen and show these separately during your presentation.
Remember, your PowerPoint is there to guide you during your presentation. Do not overload this with text.
Submit a 4-5 minute video in which you:
Use any software you are comfortable with, including Panopto, in order to record yourself speaking and presenting a PowerPoint at the same time. You and your PowerPoint must be visible during the entirety of the presentation. This cannot just be a recording of your face presenting and it cannot just be a voice over with your PowerPoint – Video and screen option should be selected on any media you use.
Clearly identify the argument. Present the premises and conclusion in your chosen article or video clip and explain their importance. Did the speakers/writers use deductive or inductive reasoning?
In your article or video clip, identify three of the following: vague/ambiguous language; credibility; cognitive bias; rhetoric; logical fallacies; generalizations; arguments from analogy; cause and effect reasoning; and value judgments about morality, law, or aesthetics.
Explain why you think the argument fits this concept. Also, identify if this was purposeful and why, and how this affects the strength of the argument.
Provide a conclusion to your video. Was the argument convincing? What is your position? (30 seconds max)
Length: 5 minutes maximum
You will be graded on:
Your ability to identify arguments made about relevant issues in our world today
How well you identify class concepts. Accuracy and a clear explanation are required
Your use of terminology from the textbook/class lectures
Your ability to showcase your critical thinking skills
Your ability to use Panopto, Screen cast-o-matic or any other media to complete your presentation
Your presentation skills and delivery
Points: 150
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Recording, Uploading, and Submitting
Videos can be recorded using any software or tool, but all videos are required to be uploaded to My Panopto Videos for assignment submission.
You can also use the Panopto Desktop Recording tool to create your video.
Click here for detailed Panopto instructions.
Rubric
Current Affairs Video Presentation
Current Affairs Video Presentation
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
75 to >66.75 ptsExceeds Expectations
Clearly demonstrates the formation of an argument based on the objectives of the assignment. The topic is covered thoroughly and expertly, and all questions are answered. Sophisticated discussion centers around critical thinking concepts and terminology. Sources are referenced.
66.75 to >59.25 ptsMeets Expectations
Demonstrates the formation of an argument based on the objectives of the assignment. The topic is mostly explained and not all questions may be answered. Discussion centers around critical thinking concepts and terminology. Sources are referenced but may be slightly erroneous.
59.25 to >54.0 ptsApproaches Expectations
Lacks clarity in the formation of an argument based on the objectives of the assignment. The topic is not thoroughly covered, which makes the meaning of the assignment unclear. Discussion related to critical thinking concepts and terminology is limited. Sources are not always referenced.
54 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Lacks clarity, argumentative structure, AND is not connected to the objectives of the assignment. The topic is poorly explained with gaps in knowledge. Not all questions may be answered. Sources are not referenced.
75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
30 to >26.7 ptsExceeds Expectations
Main points are clear and supported. Transitions are clear and logical, the organization is well planned, and the language used is appropriate and skillfully presented. Organization shows the speaker’s perceptive ability to connect concepts together as a critical thinker.
26.7 to >23.7 ptsMeets Expectations
Information is generally presented in a clear and logical order. The speaker presents the content in a somewhat organized manner but may lack confidence in the presentation. Organization shows the speaker’s ability to connect concepts together as a critical thinker.
23.7 to >21.6 ptsApproaches Expectations
Information is presented in a way that shows little organization or order. The speaker fails to present the topic in a logical manner or does so in a way that is confusing. Organization of the presentation sometimes connects ideas together, but this is done in a less than effective manner.
21.6 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Information is not presented in a clear, logical, or cohesive order. The topic is unclear, and the presentation is marred with erroneous or inconsistent information. Organization does not show a connection between concepts to highlight critical thinking skills.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality
15 to >13.35 ptsExceeds Expectations
Expertly incorporates multimedia with presentation content and contains no misspellings, grammatical errors, or flaws; slides and media are purposeful, clear, and engaging.
13.35 to >11.85 ptsMeets Expectations
Incorporates multimedia with presentation content seamlessly with 1 to 3 misspellings, grammatical errors, or flaws; slides and media are purposeful and clear, but may need to be more visually interesting.
11.85 to >10.8 ptsApproaches Expectations
Some incorporation of multimedia with presentation content and contains 3 or more misspellings, grammatical errors, or flaws; slides are not always purposeful nor clear and need to be more visually interesting.
10.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Little to no attempt at incorporating multimedia within presentation and contains several misspellings, grammatical errors or flaws that hinder understanding’ slides are not thoughtful nor visually interesting.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDelivery
30 to >26.7 ptsExceeds Expectations
Speaker maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around). Speaker does not rely on notes nor slides Uses academic tone and language.
26.7 to >23.7 ptsMeets Expectations
Speaker generally maintains good eye contact with the camera and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around) with only a few lapses. Speaker sometimes relies on reading notes and/or slides. Mostly uses academic tone and language.
23.7 to >21.6 ptsApproaches Expectations
Speaker indicates little preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. Speaker reads mostly from notes and/or is not prepared. Some attempt at using academic tone and language.
21.6 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Speaker indicates no preparation through lack of eye contact and body language. Speaker reads exclusively from notes and/or slides and is not prepared; delivery is distracting and takes away from the content. Little to no attempt at using academic tone and language.
30 pt